Oregon’s general election ballots went to print today, and IP-24, an initiative which would eliminate criminal penalties for the personal use of marijuana by individuals aged 21 and over, did not make the cut.
The petition was not allowed onto the ballot because too many of their signatures were deemed invalid for the petition to qualify for the ballot. Chief petitioner Bob Wolfe has sought an injunction to disregard the rejection of the signatures, but IP-24 will still not be allowed to be on the ballot because the printing deadline has passed.
Wolfe believes that Secretary of State Kate Brown’s office failed to establish rules for verifying the legitimacy of signatures on petitions, as is required under Oregon state law. Instead of establishing rules, Brown’s office used directives which, according to Wolfe, lack legislative oversight and public comment. Wolfe explained, “Her actions distance voters from access to the ballot and make the process more expensive and more difficult; we think that’s unconstitutional.”
According to Wolfe, many signatures were inappropriately deemed invalid because the voters were “inactive.” However, under state law, inactive voters are still considered “qualified voters.”
In a study of Brown’s offices findings, there were error rates of up to 17%.
The court case against the Secretary of State is continuing, but the time frame that allowed voters to address the issues has passed, so Wolfe and I-24 are out of contention for ballot placement this election.
Wolfe isn’t giving up, but he is encouraging supporters of IP-24 to back the Oregon Cannabis Tax Act 2012, Measure 80, which had a validity rate of 58.83% when signatures were submitted to Brown’s office.
The goal of OCTA 2012 is similar to the goal of IP-24. Backers want to legalize marijuana use and distribution for individuals 21 and older. The intention is to restore the hemp industry, shrink the black market, generate tax revenue for Oregon, and create jobs in the marijuana industry.
[Source]


Jerry said on Sep 8, 2012
Marijuana is already decriminalized in Oregon
rayc1962 said on Sep 8, 2012
Its a cannabis legalization law on the ballot in Oregon, not a decriminalization law. Go ACTA 2012!
PeacefulRebel said on Sep 9, 2012
@jerry as of now it is decriminalized for the use of a medical patient with an ailment that qualifies for mmj. IP-24 would make it anyone 21 or over could use marijuana without a docs recommendation just like alcohol. Idk I'm just guessing don't quote me.
dallas said on Sep 10, 2012
Decriminalization is definitely different than legalization.
Decriminalization often is accompanied with a fine and typically loss of one's marijuana.
Legalization means (based on the tenets of what is acceptable, 21 and over etc.) that there is no fine and that it is actually legal to partake in.
More to the point, the changing rules about what is a "valid" signature on this legislation (and not others) is circumspect at best.
One way to make sure an initiative doesn't pass is to make sure it can't be voted on