<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NUGGETRY News &#187; Massachusetts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.nuggetry.com/tag/massachusetts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.nuggetry.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:37:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>High Fees Expected From Massachusetts Medical Marijuana Program</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/high-fees-expected-from-massachusetts-medical-marijuana-program/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/high-fees-expected-from-massachusetts-medical-marijuana-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=4634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health released a number of new regulations for the state's medical marijuana program.  According to the DPH, the regulations are intended to create a "self-financed medical marijuana industry that supports patient access without relying on taxpayer resources."

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4635" title="5.25-ma" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/5.25-ma.jpg" alt="" width="325" height="250" />As a result of that goal, medical marijuana dispensaries will be required to pay a $50,000 annual fee in order to operate. Dispensaries will also be required to pay application fees totaling over $30,000 in order to get their collective up and running.  These figures are higher than the required fees in other states, which can require anywhere between $5,000 and $25,000 for a collective to open and operate.

Patients will be required to pay a $50 annual registration fee in order to keep their medical marijuana registration up to date. Patients who wish to grow their own medicine will have to pay a $100 fee in addition to their $50 annual registration fee.

Dispensaries will need to pay a $500 registration fee for each employee, which could lead to lower levels of job creation than some economists had anticipated.

Despite the high fees, it is expected that Massachusetts' medical marijuana industry will be lucrative for those willing to invest the money.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2013/05/24/medical-marijuana-dispensaries-could-face-annual-fee-massachusetts/9mkPk9tRRSPHAGsSGElTkL/story.html">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On Friday, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health released a number of new regulations for the state's medical marijuana program.  According to the DPH, the regulations are intended to create a "self-financed medical marijuana industry that supports patient access without relying on taxpayer resources."

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4635" title="5.25-ma" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/5.25-ma.jpg" alt="" width="325" height="250" />As a result of that goal, medical marijuana dispensaries will be required to pay a $50,000 annual fee in order to operate. Dispensaries will also be required to pay application fees totaling over $30,000 in order to get their collective up and running.  These figures are higher than the required fees in other states, which can require anywhere between $5,000 and $25,000 for a collective to open and operate.

Patients will be required to pay a $50 annual registration fee in order to keep their medical marijuana registration up to date. Patients who wish to grow their own medicine will have to pay a $100 fee in addition to their $50 annual registration fee.

Dispensaries will need to pay a $500 registration fee for each employee, which could lead to lower levels of job creation than some economists had anticipated.

Despite the high fees, it is expected that Massachusetts' medical marijuana industry will be lucrative for those willing to invest the money.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2013/05/24/medical-marijuana-dispensaries-could-face-annual-fee-massachusetts/9mkPk9tRRSPHAGsSGElTkL/story.html">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/high-fees-expected-from-massachusetts-medical-marijuana-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Panel Approves Final Medical Marijuana Regulations</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-panel-approves-final-medical-marijuana-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-panel-approves-final-medical-marijuana-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 15:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts Department of Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts medical society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana Guidelines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=4511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4512" title="Massachusetts-Medical1" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Massachusetts-Medical1.png" alt="" width="250" height="250" />On Wednesday, a panel of state health officials finalized Massachusetts' set of medical marijuana regulations.  While the state's medical marijuana law went into effect on January 1st, the new set of regulations are the framework under which the entire medical marijuana program will run.

The regulations state that a doctor must determine whether medical marijuana is an appropriate course of treatment for their patient.  Patients may purchase and possess up to a 60 day supply of marijuana, which has been defined as 10 ounces.  Additionally, low-income individuals who make less than $34,500 annually will be eligible for discounted prices.

The regulations also allow for the opening of 35 collectives throughout the state.  However, some cities have already taken steps to ban collectives from opening in their communities.

According to the Department of Public Health, these new regulations could also allow certain individuals to receive marijuana seeds from a dispensary and grow their own medicine.

The Massachusetts Medical Society has expressed their support of the new guidelines.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/local/hampden/final-regulations-on-medical-marijuana">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4512" title="Massachusetts-Medical1" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Massachusetts-Medical1.png" alt="" width="250" height="250" />On Wednesday, a panel of state health officials finalized Massachusetts' set of medical marijuana regulations.  While the state's medical marijuana law went into effect on January 1st, the new set of regulations are the framework under which the entire medical marijuana program will run.

The regulations state that a doctor must determine whether medical marijuana is an appropriate course of treatment for their patient.  Patients may purchase and possess up to a 60 day supply of marijuana, which has been defined as 10 ounces.  Additionally, low-income individuals who make less than $34,500 annually will be eligible for discounted prices.

The regulations also allow for the opening of 35 collectives throughout the state.  However, some cities have already taken steps to ban collectives from opening in their communities.

According to the Department of Public Health, these new regulations could also allow certain individuals to receive marijuana seeds from a dispensary and grow their own medicine.

The Massachusetts Medical Society has expressed their support of the new guidelines.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/local/hampden/final-regulations-on-medical-marijuana">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-panel-approves-final-medical-marijuana-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Court Rules &#8220;Social Sharing&#8221; of Marijuana Not a Crime</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/recreational-marijuana/massachusetts-court-rules-social-sharing-of-marijuana-not-a-crime/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/recreational-marijuana/massachusetts-court-rules-social-sharing-of-marijuana-not-a-crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recreational Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Sharing of Marijuana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=4282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled on a case of a marijuana-related arrest made after the state decriminalized possession of less than an ounce of marijuana in 2008.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4283" title="4.10-ma" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/4.10-ma.jpg" alt="" width="321" height="213" />In the case of Commonwealth v. Kiiyan Jackson, the defendant was arrested in 2010 after police officers in civilian clothing saw Jackson pass a joint to someone sitting next to him during a Hempfest celebration in Boston Common.  Jackson was arrested for distribution, which can result in $5,000 in fines or up to 2 years in prison.

However, on Friday the court ruled that "the social sharing of marijuana is no longer a crime."  This means that simply giving someone small amounts of marijuana does not constitute distribution.

Another ruling made the same day stated that while the smell of marijuana constitutes probable cause for searching a vehicle and a suspicion of DUI, it does not constitute probably cause for suspicion of marijuana distribution.

Allen St. Pierre, executive director of NORML, applauded Massachusetts as one of the frontrunners in marijuana reform.  The state decriminalized marijuana in 2008, legalized medical marijuana in 2012, and their is speculation that there will be a push for recreational legalization in 2014.  He explained, "No other state has effectively taken that many bites out of the reform apple that quickly."

The rulings help to clarify the state marijuana laws that already exist to eliminate grey areas for both marijuana smokers and police.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://dailyfreepress.com/2013/04/09/mass-court-rules-social-sharing-of-marijuana-legal/">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On Friday, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled on a case of a marijuana-related arrest made after the state decriminalized possession of less than an ounce of marijuana in 2008.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4283" title="4.10-ma" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/4.10-ma.jpg" alt="" width="321" height="213" />In the case of Commonwealth v. Kiiyan Jackson, the defendant was arrested in 2010 after police officers in civilian clothing saw Jackson pass a joint to someone sitting next to him during a Hempfest celebration in Boston Common.  Jackson was arrested for distribution, which can result in $5,000 in fines or up to 2 years in prison.

However, on Friday the court ruled that "the social sharing of marijuana is no longer a crime."  This means that simply giving someone small amounts of marijuana does not constitute distribution.

Another ruling made the same day stated that while the smell of marijuana constitutes probable cause for searching a vehicle and a suspicion of DUI, it does not constitute probably cause for suspicion of marijuana distribution.

Allen St. Pierre, executive director of NORML, applauded Massachusetts as one of the frontrunners in marijuana reform.  The state decriminalized marijuana in 2008, legalized medical marijuana in 2012, and their is speculation that there will be a push for recreational legalization in 2014.  He explained, "No other state has effectively taken that many bites out of the reform apple that quickly."

The rulings help to clarify the state marijuana laws that already exist to eliminate grey areas for both marijuana smokers and police.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://dailyfreepress.com/2013/04/09/mass-court-rules-social-sharing-of-marijuana-legal/">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/recreational-marijuana/massachusetts-court-rules-social-sharing-of-marijuana-not-a-crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Releases Proposed Medical Marijuana Regulations</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-releases-proposed-medical-marijuana-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-releases-proposed-medical-marijuana-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts Public Health Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=4199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4200" title="3.30-MA" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/3.30-MA.jpg" alt="" width="364" height="242" />Medical marijuana was approved by Massachusetts voters last November and the state's program went into effect on January 1st.  The state Department of Public Health was given until the beginning of April to establish a set of guidelines.

On Friday, the DPH submitted their recommendations to the state Public Health Council, who must vote to approve them after a series of public hearings.  The recommendations span a 45 page document covering everything from patient rights to growing to dispensaries.

“DPH solicited an unprecedented level of input in drafting these regulations to create a medical marijuana system that is right for Massachusetts,” the agency’s interim commissioner, Dr. Lauren Smith, said in a statement.

“We have sought to achieve a balanced approach that will provide appropriate access for patients, while maintaining a secure system that keeps out communities safe,” she said.

The department recommended that medical marijuana patients be able to purchase a 60-day supply of up to 10 ounces of marijuana from a collective.  The new law allows for up to 35 dispensaries throughout the state where patients can purchase their medicine.

The department also is recommending that each collective cultivate their own marijuana in order to facilitate seed to sale tracking and create a secure system.  Medical marijuana will never be allowed to be sold on a wholesale scale, as long as the DPH's recommendations are approved.

Patients will not be allowed to grow their own marijuana, with the exception of certain hardship cases where the patient is unable to get their medicine from a collective.  Because the cost of buying marijuana at a collective can be a deterrent to some patients with less money, the DPH has recommended mandatory discounts for patients with low-income levels in order to discourage illegal home grows.

The rules would also allow doctors to largely control which patients are recommended medical marijuana.  There is a list of qualifying conditions-- including cancer, MS, hepatits C, HIV, and glaucoma-- but there is also a stipulation that says doctors may recommend medical marijuana to patients if they believe it could help them with their symptoms from another illness.

State Rep. Jeffrey Sanchez, D-Boston, the House chairman of the Legislature’s public health committee, said the draft rules were only a midpoint in what will be a lengthy regulatory process.

“There is still time for citizens to weigh in on this proposal and I encourage them to do so … through the public hearings or through written comment,” Sanchez said.

The recommendations will be put before the Massachusetts Public Health Council on April 1oth.  The MPHC is a group of policy makers, physicians, and academics who review the department's recommendations and approve the final regulations.  Public hearings are the next step for the drafted regulations, and will take place on April 19th in Northampton, Plymouth, and Boston.  The public comment period will close on April 20th.

It is anticipated that the Public Health Council will vote on the final rules on May 8th.  If approved, the regulations would go into effect on May 24th.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.boston.com/whitecoatnotes/2013/03/29/doctors-and-patients-could-decide-who-gets-medical-marijuana-under-draft-mass-rules/BGIADLbsh9BA45LUGFqB3M/story.html">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4200" title="3.30-MA" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/3.30-MA.jpg" alt="" width="364" height="242" />Medical marijuana was approved by Massachusetts voters last November and the state's program went into effect on January 1st.  The state Department of Public Health was given until the beginning of April to establish a set of guidelines.

On Friday, the DPH submitted their recommendations to the state Public Health Council, who must vote to approve them after a series of public hearings.  The recommendations span a 45 page document covering everything from patient rights to growing to dispensaries.

“DPH solicited an unprecedented level of input in drafting these regulations to create a medical marijuana system that is right for Massachusetts,” the agency’s interim commissioner, Dr. Lauren Smith, said in a statement.

“We have sought to achieve a balanced approach that will provide appropriate access for patients, while maintaining a secure system that keeps out communities safe,” she said.

The department recommended that medical marijuana patients be able to purchase a 60-day supply of up to 10 ounces of marijuana from a collective.  The new law allows for up to 35 dispensaries throughout the state where patients can purchase their medicine.

The department also is recommending that each collective cultivate their own marijuana in order to facilitate seed to sale tracking and create a secure system.  Medical marijuana will never be allowed to be sold on a wholesale scale, as long as the DPH's recommendations are approved.

Patients will not be allowed to grow their own marijuana, with the exception of certain hardship cases where the patient is unable to get their medicine from a collective.  Because the cost of buying marijuana at a collective can be a deterrent to some patients with less money, the DPH has recommended mandatory discounts for patients with low-income levels in order to discourage illegal home grows.

The rules would also allow doctors to largely control which patients are recommended medical marijuana.  There is a list of qualifying conditions-- including cancer, MS, hepatits C, HIV, and glaucoma-- but there is also a stipulation that says doctors may recommend medical marijuana to patients if they believe it could help them with their symptoms from another illness.

State Rep. Jeffrey Sanchez, D-Boston, the House chairman of the Legislature’s public health committee, said the draft rules were only a midpoint in what will be a lengthy regulatory process.

“There is still time for citizens to weigh in on this proposal and I encourage them to do so … through the public hearings or through written comment,” Sanchez said.

The recommendations will be put before the Massachusetts Public Health Council on April 1oth.  The MPHC is a group of policy makers, physicians, and academics who review the department's recommendations and approve the final regulations.  Public hearings are the next step for the drafted regulations, and will take place on April 19th in Northampton, Plymouth, and Boston.  The public comment period will close on April 20th.

It is anticipated that the Public Health Council will vote on the final rules on May 8th.  If approved, the regulations would go into effect on May 24th.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.boston.com/whitecoatnotes/2013/03/29/doctors-and-patients-could-decide-who-gets-medical-marijuana-under-draft-mass-rules/BGIADLbsh9BA45LUGFqB3M/story.html">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-releases-proposed-medical-marijuana-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Attorney General Says Cities Cannot Ban Medical Marijuana Collectives</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-attorney-general-says-cities-cannot-ban-medical-marijuana-collectives/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-attorney-general-says-cities-cannot-ban-medical-marijuana-collectives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispensary Ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=4068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley issued a decision that no town or city in the state can legally prohibit medical marijuana collectives from opening within their borders.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4069" title="3.14-coakley" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/3.14-coakley.jpg" alt="" width="321" height="213" />A number of towns had already begun to discuss banning dispensaries outright.  The city of Wakefield's decision to ban dispensaries in the town is what incited Coakley's response.

The decision was written by Assistant Attorney General Margaret Hurley.  She says that the law's purpose "could not be served if a municipality could prohibit treatment centers within its borders, for if one municipality could do so, presumably all could do so."

In a separate decision in response to a  bylaw passed in the town of Burlington, Hurley said that towns may pass moratoriums on dispensaries in order to have time to plan properly, but they must be temporary.

Additionally, towns are allowed to regulate where medical marijuana dispensaries can be located via zoning laws.

Aside from Wakefield, the towns of Reading and Melrose have both recently approved medical marijuana dispensary bans.  Their Health Director, Ruth Clay, has said that she is disappointed with Coakley's decision.  She explained, "The towns will look at the variety of options that include potentially having a moratorium... or having restrictions."

Coakley's decision may turn out to have a lesser impact than the would hope, as she only has statutory authority over town bylaws, not ordinances passed by cities.  That means that some cities may be able to skirt the decision and ban medical marijuana collectives by passing an ordinance if they are really intent on doing so.  However, if those ordinances were ever challenged in court, Coakley's statement could be used in a legal defense.

Massachusetts' medical marijuana law took effect on January 1st.  The state Department of Public Health has until May 1st to issue regulations on how the program will be run.

[<a href="http://www.wbur.org/2013/03/13/coakley-medical-marijuana-town-bans">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On Wednesday, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley issued a decision that no town or city in the state can legally prohibit medical marijuana collectives from opening within their borders.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4069" title="3.14-coakley" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/3.14-coakley.jpg" alt="" width="321" height="213" />A number of towns had already begun to discuss banning dispensaries outright.  The city of Wakefield's decision to ban dispensaries in the town is what incited Coakley's response.

The decision was written by Assistant Attorney General Margaret Hurley.  She says that the law's purpose "could not be served if a municipality could prohibit treatment centers within its borders, for if one municipality could do so, presumably all could do so."

In a separate decision in response to a  bylaw passed in the town of Burlington, Hurley said that towns may pass moratoriums on dispensaries in order to have time to plan properly, but they must be temporary.

Additionally, towns are allowed to regulate where medical marijuana dispensaries can be located via zoning laws.

Aside from Wakefield, the towns of Reading and Melrose have both recently approved medical marijuana dispensary bans.  Their Health Director, Ruth Clay, has said that she is disappointed with Coakley's decision.  She explained, "The towns will look at the variety of options that include potentially having a moratorium... or having restrictions."

Coakley's decision may turn out to have a lesser impact than the would hope, as she only has statutory authority over town bylaws, not ordinances passed by cities.  That means that some cities may be able to skirt the decision and ban medical marijuana collectives by passing an ordinance if they are really intent on doing so.  However, if those ordinances were ever challenged in court, Coakley's statement could be used in a legal defense.

Massachusetts' medical marijuana law took effect on January 1st.  The state Department of Public Health has until May 1st to issue regulations on how the program will be run.

[<a href="http://www.wbur.org/2013/03/13/coakley-medical-marijuana-town-bans">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-attorney-general-says-cities-cannot-ban-medical-marijuana-collectives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Group Calls for Marijuana Research</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/medical-group-calls-for-marijuana-research/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/medical-group-calls-for-marijuana-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 15:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts medical society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=4041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Massachusetts Medical Society is calling for large-scale research of medical marijuana, saying it should be treated the same way as any other prescription drug would.  The MMS spoke out against medical marijuana legalization last year, but ironically is now calling for something that marijuana advocates have been wanting for a long time.

<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4042" title="3.9-MassMedSocLogo" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/3.9-MassMedSocLogo-300x247.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="247" />At the same time, the MMS has dropped their efforts to have marijuana rescheduled so that research could be more easily conducted.  The group recently received a response from the US DEA stating that marijuana's schedule I classification does not "preclude scientific research" on the plant or its components, as long as the research receives proper approvals.

In a statement released Friday on the MMS website, President Dr. Richard Aghababian said, "Given this information, it's time for medical and scientific communities to develop large-scale clinical trials to determine whether marijuana is safe and effective as a medical intervention.  Such research should identify all the treatment protocols that would apply to a standard pharmaceutical therapy, including indications, contraindications, dosages, length of therapy, side effects, and more."

Despite the DEA's assurances, many researchers who have been trying to do exactly what Dr. Aghababian described have faced roadblocks along the way.

For example, Dr. Igor Grant published a paper last year that showed marijuana relieved pain for HIV patients.  Based on their research, they found that marijuana's schedule I status was inappropriate.  They wrote, "The classification of marijuana as a Schedule I drug as well as the continuing controversy as to whether or not cannabis is of medical value are obstacles to medical progress in this area."

Another problem with marijuana research is that researchers must use marijuana from the federal drug supply, which is limited.  According the Rick Doblin, executive director of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies, said that there is a monopoly on the supply by the National Institute of Drug Abuse, aided by the DEA.

The MAPS has tried to gain access to the federal marijuana supply to study the effects of marijuana for PTSD patients, but the federal reviewers have said that the research is not scientifically sound.

It seems as though the DEA's answer was the diplomatic one, giving researchers and medical marijuana advocates hope.  However, once researchers actually try to have their projects approved and gain access to the federal drug supply, they may realize they are caught up in more red tape than anticipated.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2013/03/09/dea-status-quo-response-marijuana-research-satisfies-mass-medical-society/tVNXoOwxJQVIhaRdkEq5BK/story.html">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Massachusetts Medical Society is calling for large-scale research of medical marijuana, saying it should be treated the same way as any other prescription drug would.  The MMS spoke out against medical marijuana legalization last year, but ironically is now calling for something that marijuana advocates have been wanting for a long time.

<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4042" title="3.9-MassMedSocLogo" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/3.9-MassMedSocLogo-300x247.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="247" />At the same time, the MMS has dropped their efforts to have marijuana rescheduled so that research could be more easily conducted.  The group recently received a response from the US DEA stating that marijuana's schedule I classification does not "preclude scientific research" on the plant or its components, as long as the research receives proper approvals.

In a statement released Friday on the MMS website, President Dr. Richard Aghababian said, "Given this information, it's time for medical and scientific communities to develop large-scale clinical trials to determine whether marijuana is safe and effective as a medical intervention.  Such research should identify all the treatment protocols that would apply to a standard pharmaceutical therapy, including indications, contraindications, dosages, length of therapy, side effects, and more."

Despite the DEA's assurances, many researchers who have been trying to do exactly what Dr. Aghababian described have faced roadblocks along the way.

For example, Dr. Igor Grant published a paper last year that showed marijuana relieved pain for HIV patients.  Based on their research, they found that marijuana's schedule I status was inappropriate.  They wrote, "The classification of marijuana as a Schedule I drug as well as the continuing controversy as to whether or not cannabis is of medical value are obstacles to medical progress in this area."

Another problem with marijuana research is that researchers must use marijuana from the federal drug supply, which is limited.  According the Rick Doblin, executive director of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies, said that there is a monopoly on the supply by the National Institute of Drug Abuse, aided by the DEA.

The MAPS has tried to gain access to the federal marijuana supply to study the effects of marijuana for PTSD patients, but the federal reviewers have said that the research is not scientifically sound.

It seems as though the DEA's answer was the diplomatic one, giving researchers and medical marijuana advocates hope.  However, once researchers actually try to have their projects approved and gain access to the federal drug supply, they may realize they are caught up in more red tape than anticipated.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2013/03/09/dea-status-quo-response-marijuana-research-satisfies-mass-medical-society/tVNXoOwxJQVIhaRdkEq5BK/story.html">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/medical-group-calls-for-marijuana-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woman Sues FedEx For Wrongly Delivering Marijuana to Her Home</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/recreational-marijuana/woman-sues-fedex-for-delivering-marijuana-to-her-home/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/recreational-marijuana/woman-sues-fedex-for-delivering-marijuana-to-her-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recreational Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FedEx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misdelivered Marijuana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=3972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maryangela Tobin of Plymouth Ma., has filed a lawsuit against FedEx for delivering marijuana to her home and violating their privacy laws.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3973" title="3.1-fedex" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/3.1-fedex.jpg" alt="" width="342" height="144" />The company delivered 7 pounds of marijuana to Tobin's home.  She opened the package, thinking it was a birthday present for her daughter, but quickly realized it was full of weed.

The woman immediately called police.  When Tobin received a knock on her door later that night, she was shocked to find the intended recipients of the marijuana package. They repeatedly asked her for their package and did not leave the front of her home.  Tobin bolted her door and did not communicate with them anymore.

FedEx allegedly violated their privacy policy by telling the individuals Tobin's address where the marijuana had been delivered. (It seems that FedEx was unaware of the package's contents when they did so).

Police made an arrest in the case, but Tobin is now afraid for the safety of herself and her children.  She is worried that whoever the marijuana was meant for will retaliate against her for calling the police. The lawsuit alleges that by giving out her private information, FedEx effectively endangered the Tobin family.

FedEx says that is does not comment on pending lawsuits.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/03/01/3260711/mass-woman-sues-fedex-over-marijuana.html">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maryangela Tobin of Plymouth Ma., has filed a lawsuit against FedEx for delivering marijuana to her home and violating their privacy laws.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3973" title="3.1-fedex" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/3.1-fedex.jpg" alt="" width="342" height="144" />The company delivered 7 pounds of marijuana to Tobin's home.  She opened the package, thinking it was a birthday present for her daughter, but quickly realized it was full of weed.

The woman immediately called police.  When Tobin received a knock on her door later that night, she was shocked to find the intended recipients of the marijuana package. They repeatedly asked her for their package and did not leave the front of her home.  Tobin bolted her door and did not communicate with them anymore.

FedEx allegedly violated their privacy policy by telling the individuals Tobin's address where the marijuana had been delivered. (It seems that FedEx was unaware of the package's contents when they did so).

Police made an arrest in the case, but Tobin is now afraid for the safety of herself and her children.  She is worried that whoever the marijuana was meant for will retaliate against her for calling the police. The lawsuit alleges that by giving out her private information, FedEx effectively endangered the Tobin family.

FedEx says that is does not comment on pending lawsuits.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/03/01/3260711/mass-woman-sues-fedex-over-marijuana.html">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/recreational-marijuana/woman-sues-fedex-for-delivering-marijuana-to-her-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Medical Marijuana Listening Session Draws Large Crowd</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/masachusetts-marijuana-listening-session-draws-large-crowd/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/masachusetts-marijuana-listening-session-draws-large-crowd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Lauren Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listening Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worcester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=3837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, Massachusetts health official held the first of four listening sessions to seek input from residents regarding the state's new medical marijuana program.  The meeting, held at the Worcester Public Library, drew a large crowd and was standing room only.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3838" title="2.14-worcesdter" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2.14-worcesdter.jpg" alt="" width="352" height="281" />Department of Public Health Commissioner Dr. Lauren Smith explained of the program, "We are looking to balance how we approach this, the needs of the patients that are seeking relief with the protections and safety of the public that are not participating in the program."

At the session, Dr. Smith said the department will listen to and acknowledge all of the concerns and questions raised by community members.  She said, "We will listen and take copious notes as we go across the state at these listening sessions and we will determine how to incorporate that into regulations that we are developing."

One of the meeting's attendees was Dr. Karen Munkacy, who works in pain management and believes in marijuana use for the treatment of symptoms related to Parkinson's and cancer.  "Marijuana is the only thing that stops nausea and it also is the only anti-nausea medication that also increases appetite so for cancer patients it's very helpful," she said.

Others were in opposition to dispensaries and voiced their concerns.  Community activist William Breault said, "It is becoming clearer as places in the country such as Los Angeles are closing their dispensaries.  They have closed 600 of them and it's because of what is happening in them and around them."  While Mr. Breault's opinion may be valid, the information he shared demonstrates how the media and other outlets can form peoples' opinions and scare them into being against medical marijuana.

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health will continue to hold the listening sessions as they work toward developing a strong, safe medical marijuana system for patients and community members alike.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.necn.com/02/13/13/Standing-room-only-at-medical-marijuana-/landing.html?blockID=831011&amp;feedID=11106">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On Wednesday, Massachusetts health official held the first of four listening sessions to seek input from residents regarding the state's new medical marijuana program.  The meeting, held at the Worcester Public Library, drew a large crowd and was standing room only.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3838" title="2.14-worcesdter" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2.14-worcesdter.jpg" alt="" width="352" height="281" />Department of Public Health Commissioner Dr. Lauren Smith explained of the program, "We are looking to balance how we approach this, the needs of the patients that are seeking relief with the protections and safety of the public that are not participating in the program."

At the session, Dr. Smith said the department will listen to and acknowledge all of the concerns and questions raised by community members.  She said, "We will listen and take copious notes as we go across the state at these listening sessions and we will determine how to incorporate that into regulations that we are developing."

One of the meeting's attendees was Dr. Karen Munkacy, who works in pain management and believes in marijuana use for the treatment of symptoms related to Parkinson's and cancer.  "Marijuana is the only thing that stops nausea and it also is the only anti-nausea medication that also increases appetite so for cancer patients it's very helpful," she said.

Others were in opposition to dispensaries and voiced their concerns.  Community activist William Breault said, "It is becoming clearer as places in the country such as Los Angeles are closing their dispensaries.  They have closed 600 of them and it's because of what is happening in them and around them."  While Mr. Breault's opinion may be valid, the information he shared demonstrates how the media and other outlets can form peoples' opinions and scare them into being against medical marijuana.

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health will continue to hold the listening sessions as they work toward developing a strong, safe medical marijuana system for patients and community members alike.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.necn.com/02/13/13/Standing-room-only-at-medical-marijuana-/landing.html?blockID=831011&amp;feedID=11106">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/masachusetts-marijuana-listening-session-draws-large-crowd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>100 Pounds of Marijuana Seized in Lowell</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/marijuana-crime/100-pounds-of-marijuana-seized-in-lowell/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/marijuana-crime/100-pounds-of-marijuana-seized-in-lowell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=3818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lowell, Ma. police officers made their largest ever seizure of marijuana on Monday after they discovered almost 100 pounds of weed in an apartment on School Street.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3819" title="2.12-Lowell_skyline" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2.12-Lowell_skyline.jpg" alt="" width="361" height="240" />Detectives with the city's Special Investigations Unit served a search warrant at the apartment where Pros Chea lived.  Once inside, they discovered the marijuana as well as ammunition.  Chea was arrested and is being held without bail on charges of trafficking marijuana, distribution of marijuana, and illegal possession of ammunition.

Marijuana possession is decriminalized in Lowell, which police believe creates a higher demand because people are not as concerned about buying the drug.

Captain Jonathan Webb explained, "The issue is the traffickers are dealing in huge quantities since everyone thinks it's legal."

Police are estimating the marijuana seized is worth between $200,000 and $300,000.  While buying an ounce may not seem like much to some, when you add up the dealer's stock, it is a significant amount of illegal marijuana.

Webb said, "When you're talking about that type of money, the issue isn't someone smoking a joint.  With that much weight comes the potential for violence, because you're talking about that kind of money."

Chea is scheduled to be arraigned in Lowell District Court on Tuesday.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.lowellsun.com/local/ci_22571589/about-100-pounds-marijuana-seized-lowell">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lowell, Ma. police officers made their largest ever seizure of marijuana on Monday after they discovered almost 100 pounds of weed in an apartment on School Street.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3819" title="2.12-Lowell_skyline" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2.12-Lowell_skyline.jpg" alt="" width="361" height="240" />Detectives with the city's Special Investigations Unit served a search warrant at the apartment where Pros Chea lived.  Once inside, they discovered the marijuana as well as ammunition.  Chea was arrested and is being held without bail on charges of trafficking marijuana, distribution of marijuana, and illegal possession of ammunition.

Marijuana possession is decriminalized in Lowell, which police believe creates a higher demand because people are not as concerned about buying the drug.

Captain Jonathan Webb explained, "The issue is the traffickers are dealing in huge quantities since everyone thinks it's legal."

Police are estimating the marijuana seized is worth between $200,000 and $300,000.  While buying an ounce may not seem like much to some, when you add up the dealer's stock, it is a significant amount of illegal marijuana.

Webb said, "When you're talking about that type of money, the issue isn't someone smoking a joint.  With that much weight comes the potential for violence, because you're talking about that kind of money."

Chea is scheduled to be arraigned in Lowell District Court on Tuesday.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.lowellsun.com/local/ci_22571589/about-100-pounds-marijuana-seized-lowell">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/marijuana-crime/100-pounds-of-marijuana-seized-in-lowell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts to Hold Medical Marijuana Public Listening Sessions</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-to-hold-medical-marijuana-public-listening-session/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-to-hold-medical-marijuana-public-listening-session/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Listening Sessions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=3720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massachusetts health officials have scheduled three public listening sessions where residents of the Bay State will be able to voice their concerns, questions, or feedback regarding the state's new medical marijuana program.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3721" title="1.30-mammj" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/1.30-mammj.jpeg" alt="" width="394" height="249" />The MA Department of Public Health is required to have regulations established by May 1st, and they are currently seeking feedback on a number of specific topics.

The DPH released a flier on Wednesday outlining the issues, including: the criteria for deciding which types of conditions patients must have to be authorized for medical marijuana use; security requirements for treatment centers; defining the quantity of marijuana that constitutes a 60 day supply, criteria for the use of marijuana in food products for medical purposes; and the requirements for people who apply to grow their own marijuana because of financial hardship or lack of reasonable transportation to a dispensary.

On Tuesday, interim public health commissioner Dr. Lauren Smith explained that the meetings have been planned because "We [the DPH] feel it's important to hear what the concerns are."

The three hour sessions will be held in Worcester, Boston, and Holyoke.  Each person who wants to speak will be given three minutes to share their opinions.

The Worcester session will be held on February 13 from 2 to 5 pm at the Worcester Public Library Saxe Room.  The Boston Session will be held on February 14 from 10 am to 1 pm at Roxbury Community College Reggie Lewis Track &amp; Athlete Center.  The Holyoke session will be held on February 27 from 1:30 to 4:30 pm at the Holyoke Community College Kittredge Business Center.

Written comments will also be accepted through February 28 at the Department of Public Health, Attention: Medical Marijuana Listening Sessions, 250 Washington St., 2d Floor, Boston MA 02108.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2013/01/29/mass-schedules-listening-sessions-gather-public-input-medical-marijuana-rules/C0veyofRnSYfgHw2DpmSEL/story.html">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Massachusetts health officials have scheduled three public listening sessions where residents of the Bay State will be able to voice their concerns, questions, or feedback regarding the state's new medical marijuana program.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3721" title="1.30-mammj" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/1.30-mammj.jpeg" alt="" width="394" height="249" />The MA Department of Public Health is required to have regulations established by May 1st, and they are currently seeking feedback on a number of specific topics.

The DPH released a flier on Wednesday outlining the issues, including: the criteria for deciding which types of conditions patients must have to be authorized for medical marijuana use; security requirements for treatment centers; defining the quantity of marijuana that constitutes a 60 day supply, criteria for the use of marijuana in food products for medical purposes; and the requirements for people who apply to grow their own marijuana because of financial hardship or lack of reasonable transportation to a dispensary.

On Tuesday, interim public health commissioner Dr. Lauren Smith explained that the meetings have been planned because "We [the DPH] feel it's important to hear what the concerns are."

The three hour sessions will be held in Worcester, Boston, and Holyoke.  Each person who wants to speak will be given three minutes to share their opinions.

The Worcester session will be held on February 13 from 2 to 5 pm at the Worcester Public Library Saxe Room.  The Boston Session will be held on February 14 from 10 am to 1 pm at Roxbury Community College Reggie Lewis Track &amp; Athlete Center.  The Holyoke session will be held on February 27 from 1:30 to 4:30 pm at the Holyoke Community College Kittredge Business Center.

Written comments will also be accepted through February 28 at the Department of Public Health, Attention: Medical Marijuana Listening Sessions, 250 Washington St., 2d Floor, Boston MA 02108.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2013/01/29/mass-schedules-listening-sessions-gather-public-input-medical-marijuana-rules/C0veyofRnSYfgHw2DpmSEL/story.html">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-to-hold-medical-marijuana-public-listening-session/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Marijuana Could Be Delayed in Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/medical-marijuana-could-be-delayed-in-massachusetts/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/medical-marijuana-could-be-delayed-in-massachusetts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator John Keenan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=3379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November, Massachusetts voters approved Question 3, which legalizes the possession, sale, and use of marijuana for medical purposes.  The law is set to go into effect in less than two weeks, but some are worried that the state hasn't had enough time to prepare.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3380" title="12.17-shutterstock_103223864" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/12.17-shutterstock_103223864.jpg" alt="" width="334" height="223" />The Massachusetts Department of Public Health has until the end of April to write regulations, but as of January first some entrepreneurs will be opening medical marijuana consultation centers where patients can receive a doctor's recommendation to become a part of the program.

Senator John Keenan is so concerned that things are progressing too quickly that he has written a bill to delay the law for six months.

Keenan explained, "It will be during the first 120 days after its effective date there'll be a situation where anything will go.  All that somebody needs to be able to possess marijuana is a medical certification which can be obtained from a physician not necessarily from Massachusetts."

Senator Keenan believes his proposed bill would eliminate the uncertainty many state and local officials are feeling.  His bill would create a clear system where a person would obtain medical marijuana the same way someone would obtain prescription pills.  He wants there to be a new system "where the physician would authorize use on a secure prescription pad and perhaps do that through courier and mail so that we don't have dispensaries in the communities and we don't have cultivation occurring in the communities."

The Massachusetts Municipal Association, a group of more than 200 cities and towns in the state, has asked for a delay of six months to the law.  The group's head, Geoff Beckwith, explained, "Some communities may wish to say they prefer not to have and don't want to have dispensaries in their community.  Others might want to have them located in an area near medical facilities."

Many towns will not have the opportunity to approve, deny, or regulate dispensaries proactively due to the fact that most town meetings are not held until the spring.  If the implementation of the law were delayed six months, that would give cities the opportunity to prepare for the arrival of medical marijuana facilities.

Many medical marijuana advocates are fighting a delay, but some understand the importance of having the cities on their side.  Cities like Los Angeles have struggled to regulate a medical marijuana collective system, which has led them to try to ban dispensaries outright.  If Massachusetts cities and towns are given the extra time they are asking for, it may create an environment of openness and compromise with medical marijuana moving forward.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.wbur.org/2012/12/17/medical-marijuana-law-delay">Source</a>]

&nbsp;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In November, Massachusetts voters approved Question 3, which legalizes the possession, sale, and use of marijuana for medical purposes.  The law is set to go into effect in less than two weeks, but some are worried that the state hasn't had enough time to prepare.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3380" title="12.17-shutterstock_103223864" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/12.17-shutterstock_103223864.jpg" alt="" width="334" height="223" />The Massachusetts Department of Public Health has until the end of April to write regulations, but as of January first some entrepreneurs will be opening medical marijuana consultation centers where patients can receive a doctor's recommendation to become a part of the program.

Senator John Keenan is so concerned that things are progressing too quickly that he has written a bill to delay the law for six months.

Keenan explained, "It will be during the first 120 days after its effective date there'll be a situation where anything will go.  All that somebody needs to be able to possess marijuana is a medical certification which can be obtained from a physician not necessarily from Massachusetts."

Senator Keenan believes his proposed bill would eliminate the uncertainty many state and local officials are feeling.  His bill would create a clear system where a person would obtain medical marijuana the same way someone would obtain prescription pills.  He wants there to be a new system "where the physician would authorize use on a secure prescription pad and perhaps do that through courier and mail so that we don't have dispensaries in the communities and we don't have cultivation occurring in the communities."

The Massachusetts Municipal Association, a group of more than 200 cities and towns in the state, has asked for a delay of six months to the law.  The group's head, Geoff Beckwith, explained, "Some communities may wish to say they prefer not to have and don't want to have dispensaries in their community.  Others might want to have them located in an area near medical facilities."

Many towns will not have the opportunity to approve, deny, or regulate dispensaries proactively due to the fact that most town meetings are not held until the spring.  If the implementation of the law were delayed six months, that would give cities the opportunity to prepare for the arrival of medical marijuana facilities.

Many medical marijuana advocates are fighting a delay, but some understand the importance of having the cities on their side.  Cities like Los Angeles have struggled to regulate a medical marijuana collective system, which has led them to try to ban dispensaries outright.  If Massachusetts cities and towns are given the extra time they are asking for, it may create an environment of openness and compromise with medical marijuana moving forward.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.wbur.org/2012/12/17/medical-marijuana-law-delay">Source</a>]

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/medical-marijuana-could-be-delayed-in-massachusetts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lowell, MA Makes Zoning Amendments to Control Medical Marijuana Dispensaries</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/lowell-ma-makes-zoning-amendments-to-control-medical-marijuana-dispensaries/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/lowell-ma-makes-zoning-amendments-to-control-medical-marijuana-dispensaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoning Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=3289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3290" title="12.4-shutterstock_87071669" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/12.4-shutterstock_87071669.jpg" alt="" width="298" height="376" />The city of Lowell, Massachusetts is making zoning restrictions to help control where medical marijuana dispensaries will be allowed to operate.  Unlike other towns in Massachusetts, Lowell is not looking to completely ban collectives, but they want to control where they open in order to ensure they are received well by community members.

Assistant City Manager Adam Baacke explained that the intent is to keep dispensaries from over-saturating one area of the city and to keep them away from residential areas, schools, and public libraries.

The new zoning amendment could be finished as soon as this week.  It is being drafted with contributions from the city's law, planning, health, and police departments.  Once completed, the amendment will be reviewed by the Planning Board and City Council, who must both approve it in order for it to take effect.

Similar restrictions on where collectives can be located are being established in Boston, Framingham, and Quincy.  Cities such as Reading and Wakefield have already moved to completely ban collectives.

Officials from other cities are not so concerned.  Only 35 dispensaries will be able to open throughout the state, and there are over ten times as many communities that they could potentially choose to set up shop.

Leominster Mayor Dean Mazzarella does not think his community of just over 40,000 residents will be a target for someone wanting to open a dispensary.  "How many can there be?" he asked.  "Is there going to be one on every corner?  I just think enough of the bigger areas will have them, the bigger cities."

Tewksbury selectman Douglas Sears has expressed that he thinks the city would be a good place to open a dispensary.  He has recommended opening one in the city's hospital.  He explained, "It has a pharmacy.  It's already run by the state.  And it has the safeguards of its own campus police, plus we have the Tewksbury police.  The state is already heavily involved in the administration of controlled substances at that location."

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.lowellsun.com/todaysheadlines/ci_22119924/lowell-doping-out-plan-limit-medical-marijuana-sales">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3290" title="12.4-shutterstock_87071669" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/12.4-shutterstock_87071669.jpg" alt="" width="298" height="376" />The city of Lowell, Massachusetts is making zoning restrictions to help control where medical marijuana dispensaries will be allowed to operate.  Unlike other towns in Massachusetts, Lowell is not looking to completely ban collectives, but they want to control where they open in order to ensure they are received well by community members.

Assistant City Manager Adam Baacke explained that the intent is to keep dispensaries from over-saturating one area of the city and to keep them away from residential areas, schools, and public libraries.

The new zoning amendment could be finished as soon as this week.  It is being drafted with contributions from the city's law, planning, health, and police departments.  Once completed, the amendment will be reviewed by the Planning Board and City Council, who must both approve it in order for it to take effect.

Similar restrictions on where collectives can be located are being established in Boston, Framingham, and Quincy.  Cities such as Reading and Wakefield have already moved to completely ban collectives.

Officials from other cities are not so concerned.  Only 35 dispensaries will be able to open throughout the state, and there are over ten times as many communities that they could potentially choose to set up shop.

Leominster Mayor Dean Mazzarella does not think his community of just over 40,000 residents will be a target for someone wanting to open a dispensary.  "How many can there be?" he asked.  "Is there going to be one on every corner?  I just think enough of the bigger areas will have them, the bigger cities."

Tewksbury selectman Douglas Sears has expressed that he thinks the city would be a good place to open a dispensary.  He has recommended opening one in the city's hospital.  He explained, "It has a pharmacy.  It's already run by the state.  And it has the safeguards of its own campus police, plus we have the Tewksbury police.  The state is already heavily involved in the administration of controlled substances at that location."

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.lowellsun.com/todaysheadlines/ci_22119924/lowell-doping-out-plan-limit-medical-marijuana-sales">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/lowell-ma-makes-zoning-amendments-to-control-medical-marijuana-dispensaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Medical Marijuana Recommendation Clinics Plan to Open in Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/two-medical-marijuana-recommendation-clinics-plan-to-open-in-massachusetts/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/two-medical-marijuana-recommendation-clinics-plan-to-open-in-massachusetts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommendation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=3286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massachusetts' medical marijuana law goes into effect in early January, and members of the MMJ community from other states are planning on being a part of the state's new industry.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3287" title="12.3-shutterstock_102116368" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/12.3-shutterstock_102116368.jpg" alt="" width="334" height="220" />CannaMed and Integr8, medical marijuana business that provide doctor recommendations to patients in California and Maine respectively, plan to open two locations in Massachusetts-- one in Cambridge and one in Framingham.

In order to be eligible to possess and use medical marijuana, Massachusetts patients must be verified by a physician to have one of the state's qualifying debilitating illnesses.

Many general physicians do not want to recommend medical marijuana, due to the drug's illegal status under federal law.  That is where companies like CannaMed and Integr8 come in.

CannaMed regional manager Richard Tav explained of the decision to expand to the east coast, "We've been planning this for quite a while."

CannaMed charges $199 for a recommendation.  It is the oldest medical marijuana consultation business in Thousand Oaks, CA, having been established in 2004.  Integr8 is more expensive, charging $300 for new patient visits.

As the January start-date approaches, it is certain that more and more businesses will be opening to help serve patients who want to be a part of Massachusetts' medical marijuana program.  Since both Integr8 and CannaMed already have experience in the field and positive track records of compliance with state laws, hopefully they will provide a positive example for others looking to open consultation centers in the future.

[<a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20221203drug_activity_in_neighborhood_two_medical_marijuana_clinics_moving_in/srvc=home&amp;position=1">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Massachusetts' medical marijuana law goes into effect in early January, and members of the MMJ community from other states are planning on being a part of the state's new industry.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3287" title="12.3-shutterstock_102116368" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/12.3-shutterstock_102116368.jpg" alt="" width="334" height="220" />CannaMed and Integr8, medical marijuana business that provide doctor recommendations to patients in California and Maine respectively, plan to open two locations in Massachusetts-- one in Cambridge and one in Framingham.

In order to be eligible to possess and use medical marijuana, Massachusetts patients must be verified by a physician to have one of the state's qualifying debilitating illnesses.

Many general physicians do not want to recommend medical marijuana, due to the drug's illegal status under federal law.  That is where companies like CannaMed and Integr8 come in.

CannaMed regional manager Richard Tav explained of the decision to expand to the east coast, "We've been planning this for quite a while."

CannaMed charges $199 for a recommendation.  It is the oldest medical marijuana consultation business in Thousand Oaks, CA, having been established in 2004.  Integr8 is more expensive, charging $300 for new patient visits.

As the January start-date approaches, it is certain that more and more businesses will be opening to help serve patients who want to be a part of Massachusetts' medical marijuana program.  Since both Integr8 and CannaMed already have experience in the field and positive track records of compliance with state laws, hopefully they will provide a positive example for others looking to open consultation centers in the future.

[<a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20221203drug_activity_in_neighborhood_two_medical_marijuana_clinics_moving_in/srvc=home&amp;position=1">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/two-medical-marijuana-recommendation-clinics-plan-to-open-in-massachusetts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Lawmakers Begin to Pick Apart Medical Marijuana Referendum</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-lawmakers-begin-to-pick-apart-medical-marijuana-referendum/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-lawmakers-begin-to-pick-apart-medical-marijuana-referendum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Pignatelli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=3217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massachusetts lawmakers are beginning to pick apart the state's newly approved medical marijuana referendum.  Question 3 passed with 63% of the vote, but city and state officials will be the ones to determine the final language of the law and determine how the system works.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3218" title="11.22-shutterstock_82989223" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/11.22-shutterstock_82989223.jpg" alt="" width="363" height="242" /> State Representative William Pignatelli shared with <em>The Berkshire Eagle</em> that the legislature will likely "tighten the very loose and open-ended" language in the law to guarantee that the medical marijuana system is not abused.

Many opponents of Question 3 expressed concern that the language of the referendum was too vague and did not do enough to establish a plan for the state's program.

Pignatelli explained that lawmakers, "now have the obligation and the responsibility to implement restrictions for law enforcement and the medical field and make sure marijuana does not go to people who will put the drugs in the wrong hands."

Police departments across the state are awaiting instruction from the Department of Public Health on how the new medical marijuana regulations will be enforced.  The DPH is tasked with determining registration and administrative processes for opening medical marijuana 'treatment centers.'

The DPH will establish guidelines for how much marijuana a patient is allowed to possess, the fees for registering a treatment center, and the framework for patients with hardship being able to grow medical marijuana at home.

Massachusetts joined 17 other states and the District of Columbia in legalizing the medical use of marijuana earlier this month.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.berkshireeagle.com/ci_22046900">Source</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Massachusetts lawmakers are beginning to pick apart the state's newly approved medical marijuana referendum.  Question 3 passed with 63% of the vote, but city and state officials will be the ones to determine the final language of the law and determine how the system works.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3218" title="11.22-shutterstock_82989223" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/11.22-shutterstock_82989223.jpg" alt="" width="363" height="242" /> State Representative William Pignatelli shared with <em>The Berkshire Eagle</em> that the legislature will likely "tighten the very loose and open-ended" language in the law to guarantee that the medical marijuana system is not abused.

Many opponents of Question 3 expressed concern that the language of the referendum was too vague and did not do enough to establish a plan for the state's program.

Pignatelli explained that lawmakers, "now have the obligation and the responsibility to implement restrictions for law enforcement and the medical field and make sure marijuana does not go to people who will put the drugs in the wrong hands."

Police departments across the state are awaiting instruction from the Department of Public Health on how the new medical marijuana regulations will be enforced.  The DPH is tasked with determining registration and administrative processes for opening medical marijuana 'treatment centers.'

The DPH will establish guidelines for how much marijuana a patient is allowed to possess, the fees for registering a treatment center, and the framework for patients with hardship being able to grow medical marijuana at home.

Massachusetts joined 17 other states and the District of Columbia in legalizing the medical use of marijuana earlier this month.

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://www.berkshireeagle.com/ci_22046900">Source</a>]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-lawmakers-begin-to-pick-apart-medical-marijuana-referendum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Towns Begin Reacting to Possibility of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries</title>
		<link>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-towns-begin-reacting-to-possibility-of-medical-marijuana-dispensaries/</link>
		<comments>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-towns-begin-reacting-to-possibility-of-medical-marijuana-dispensaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lexington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quincy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.nuggetry.com/?p=3164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medical marijuana was legalized in Massachusetts just over a week ago, but towns are already taking steps to ensure that medical marijuana dispensaries are not allowed in their communities.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3165" title="11.14-shutterstock_90707974" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/11.14-shutterstock_90707974.jpg" alt="" width="347" height="275" />Massachusetts' law allows for 35 medical marijuana treatment centers statewide.  The odds of a medical marijuana collective ending up in their towns is slim, but some cities' residents are already taking steps to ensure medical marijuana shops will not be allowed in their communities.

On Tuesday night during a town hall meeting in Reading, members voted 113-39 to change zoning laws to prohibit medical marijuana collectives from being able to open or operate in the town.  This is somewhat surprising, as on election day almost 60% of Reading voters supported medical marijuana legalization in the state.  Now that it has been legalized, they do not want the shops associated with their town.

Those in favor of changing zoning laws to effectively ban medical marijuana collectives from the town cited the fact that marijuana is still illegal on a federal level.  Police Chief James Cormier also expressed concern that dispensaries would draw 'transients' to the area and increase robberies.

Elaine Webb, president of the Reading Coalition Against Substance Abuse's board of directors, spoke out against collectives due to the negative impact she believes their presence will have on children and adolescents in the town.

Opponents of the zoning change called the proponents' arguments "scare tactics."  The buzz phrases used by the proponents have been heard through dozens of communities throughout the US and target peoples' emotional vulnerabilities.

Those who opposed the zoning change argued that allowing a treatment center in the town would be carrying through with Reading voters' intent in legalizing the drug for medical use.

Middlesex County, where Reading is located, allows for 5 dispensaries to open.  There are hundreds of cities in Middlesex County, but some Reading residents are working to ensure that their town will not become home to a collective.

The city of Melrose also plans to consider a proposal that will ban medical marijuana collectives from opening in the city.  The city's Board of Alderman and Planning Board will hold a joint meeting next Monday to consider changing some city ordinances that would ban medical marijuana treatment centers in all zoning districts in the city.

Additionally, Lexington, MA police Chief Mark Corr has told members of the press that he is researching what it would take for a medical marijuana treatment center to open in the city, and which local bylaws could be used to prevent that from happening.

Corr said that he's also researching communities that have prohibited the public use of marijuana with hopes of bringing forward a similar measure in Lexington.

While some towns are more prudent about making it as difficult as possible for marijuana shops to open in their towns, others are still open to the idea and are trying to figure out the best way to regulate the shops so that the system does not get out of control as has happened in some other medical marijuana states.

On Tuesday, the Quincy city council considered an ordinance proposal, which intended to limit medical marijuana collectives from being located within 1,500 feet of a school, park, daycare, bar/establishment that sells alcohol, or residential area.

Marijuana activists showed up to the meeting to argue that, based on the city layout of Quincy, this ordinance would make it essentially impossible to find any property that would be allowed to use as a medical marijuana treatment center.

In Quincy, the decision is going to be a public process.  At the meeting, Councilors expressed support for starting a dialogue about where medical marijuana collectives should be allowed as soon as possible, as Massachusetts' medical marijuana law goes into effect January 1.  City Councilor Brian Palmucci has already received inquiries from people who hope to open treatment centers in the city, so he wants to have a system established before the city gets inundated with requests.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://reading-northreading.patch.com/articles/no-medical-marijuana-treatment-center-in-reading-town-meeting-says">Source</a>]

&nbsp;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Medical marijuana was legalized in Massachusetts just over a week ago, but towns are already taking steps to ensure that medical marijuana dispensaries are not allowed in their communities.

<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3165" title="11.14-shutterstock_90707974" src="http://news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/11.14-shutterstock_90707974.jpg" alt="" width="347" height="275" />Massachusetts' law allows for 35 medical marijuana treatment centers statewide.  The odds of a medical marijuana collective ending up in their towns is slim, but some cities' residents are already taking steps to ensure medical marijuana shops will not be allowed in their communities.

On Tuesday night during a town hall meeting in Reading, members voted 113-39 to change zoning laws to prohibit medical marijuana collectives from being able to open or operate in the town.  This is somewhat surprising, as on election day almost 60% of Reading voters supported medical marijuana legalization in the state.  Now that it has been legalized, they do not want the shops associated with their town.

Those in favor of changing zoning laws to effectively ban medical marijuana collectives from the town cited the fact that marijuana is still illegal on a federal level.  Police Chief James Cormier also expressed concern that dispensaries would draw 'transients' to the area and increase robberies.

Elaine Webb, president of the Reading Coalition Against Substance Abuse's board of directors, spoke out against collectives due to the negative impact she believes their presence will have on children and adolescents in the town.

Opponents of the zoning change called the proponents' arguments "scare tactics."  The buzz phrases used by the proponents have been heard through dozens of communities throughout the US and target peoples' emotional vulnerabilities.

Those who opposed the zoning change argued that allowing a treatment center in the town would be carrying through with Reading voters' intent in legalizing the drug for medical use.

Middlesex County, where Reading is located, allows for 5 dispensaries to open.  There are hundreds of cities in Middlesex County, but some Reading residents are working to ensure that their town will not become home to a collective.

The city of Melrose also plans to consider a proposal that will ban medical marijuana collectives from opening in the city.  The city's Board of Alderman and Planning Board will hold a joint meeting next Monday to consider changing some city ordinances that would ban medical marijuana treatment centers in all zoning districts in the city.

Additionally, Lexington, MA police Chief Mark Corr has told members of the press that he is researching what it would take for a medical marijuana treatment center to open in the city, and which local bylaws could be used to prevent that from happening.

Corr said that he's also researching communities that have prohibited the public use of marijuana with hopes of bringing forward a similar measure in Lexington.

While some towns are more prudent about making it as difficult as possible for marijuana shops to open in their towns, others are still open to the idea and are trying to figure out the best way to regulate the shops so that the system does not get out of control as has happened in some other medical marijuana states.

On Tuesday, the Quincy city council considered an ordinance proposal, which intended to limit medical marijuana collectives from being located within 1,500 feet of a school, park, daycare, bar/establishment that sells alcohol, or residential area.

Marijuana activists showed up to the meeting to argue that, based on the city layout of Quincy, this ordinance would make it essentially impossible to find any property that would be allowed to use as a medical marijuana treatment center.

In Quincy, the decision is going to be a public process.  At the meeting, Councilors expressed support for starting a dialogue about where medical marijuana collectives should be allowed as soon as possible, as Massachusetts' medical marijuana law goes into effect January 1.  City Councilor Brian Palmucci has already received inquiries from people who hope to open treatment centers in the city, so he wants to have a system established before the city gets inundated with requests.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

[<a href="http://reading-northreading.patch.com/articles/no-medical-marijuana-treatment-center-in-reading-town-meeting-says">Source</a>]

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.nuggetry.com/medical-marijuana/massachusetts-towns-begin-reacting-to-possibility-of-medical-marijuana-dispensaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 1487/1719 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via news.nuggetry.netdna-cdn.com

 Served from: news.nuggetry.com @ 2013-05-25 20:51:15 by W3 Total Cache -->